the belford group will do whatever lies
in our power to spread and distribute
this report worldwide and bring it to
the attention of key responsibles and
influential people with a conscience
towards humanity you don't find very
much of them
but by the time that new world order
will have been forgotten
as a quote we hope that global awareness
will still be remembered
for this very important task
of coming commenting this report
and reviewing it we needed to find an
academic
an academic of undisputed reputation
familiar with the subject and the
problematics and especially willing to
comment freely and objectively in a
critical way
i believe that you understand how
difficult it is to find such a person
you will therefore also understand how
delighted and grateful we are to
introduce this expert in aviation and
space technology from the technician
university at delft in the netherlands
ladies and gentlemen please welcome
vermeer
thank you very much
it's an honor for me to be here
with so many of you uh
a few weeks ago peter reiger asked me to
review this 300 or more page report
and of course first i declined because i
said well it's i'm not an expert and
then he said well there are no experts
basically
not in the open at least and because i'm
well i tend to be a bit open-minded i am
not here on behalf of our university
but i do work there as an aerospace
engineer so at least the trailing
business is part of my space my work
space
but i also organize a lot of lectures
out of the box for the delft university
and well this is typically out of the
box
so i said okay i will do it
um i'm going to sit down because i have
to do a lot of reading this is
scientific stuff so that means
300 pages i won't give them to you but i
will give you some of the pages and
peter asked me to um
to be as objective as possible i think
that is an
impossibility because you can never be
objective about anything but i will try
to be as much as i can
it is not that i was unfamiliar with uh
the contrail chemtrail discussion
because we have a lot of first-year
students in delft uh studying
aeronautical engineering uh about 500 a
year so that's a lot and there are
always maybe between five to 15 students
who ask questions to teachers
and at first you think well okay it's
quite normal and then you start thinking
about it again
and it seems to be more difficult than
at first sight
okay so this is the report case orange
it is called for reasons that i will
come back to you on uh contrail science
its impact on climate and weather
manipulation programs conducted by the
united states and its allies
the authors are unknown
that is always a bit dubious as you can
understand because well you cannot talk
to the scientists involved and that
makes this
quite a special job
the introduction and the evaluation of
the report are my on my account the rest
of the five chapters are
from this report by the unknown authors
let's start with the introduction
we heard it today already a few times we
have got shifting bass lines
that means that i'm of another
generation and many of you are that
remember that there are blue skies
uh every now and then
you could see an aircraft with a trail
which we find quite normal
um but you know usually people are with
their hats to the grounds in their own
two-dimensional space and they don't
look up but if you do you see more and
more space like this and it it worried
me too i have no explanations to our
students about these phenomena
so that is important to realize
well this of course you all know
if you look at them
from a scientific point of view
the first thing a scientist does is
trying to explain something
because i'm smart and my students are
not as smart yet so i have to give them
answers to questions but if you ask most
scientists honestly they cannot answer
all your questions which is just a truth
to
keep in mind
so this looks normal maybe it is maybe
it's not
on the internet there's a lot of
discussion and you all recognize these
pictures um
by the way i cannot say that there are
toxins in these barrels that's not what
i've investigated i do know from
experience that these barrels are used
for shifting water down the plane in
test flights to simulate
uh movements of the center of gravity
around the aircraft to
for for control and
steering testing so that's quite normal
this is not
a conspiracy
in all cases at least
so if you look at these contrails of
course we live in a world of photoshop
as an expert i cannot say that these
things are wrong
if i see them myself then i'm a first
eye first-hand eyewitness i can say
something about it
but it is not normal what you see here
is absolutely not as it should be
the same goes for this pattern here
which was seen above the netherlands and
not only the netherlands of course we've
seen many pictures already
also above the northern netherlands a
few weeks ago
and they are often explained as holding
patterns
while holding patterns are given to
aircraft who have to hold
before they can land well in this part
of the country we cannot have this many
aircraft holding and especially on the
altitudes that they are holding you
should not be able to see chemtrails in
a perfectly blue sky so these are
strange phenomenon as well
okay
that in mind i'm going to the report and
the report is
divided in a few chapters as you can see
here we'll
go through them all
contrails then we have known them ever
since men started to fly at high
altitude and this picture here is famous
for the b-17 bombers in the second world
war and they didn't like it the pilots
didn't like these trails because they
made enemy fighters uh much and he gave
enemy fighters an easier job to track
them down
so they didn't like that
the question that came to my mind
immediately what what is a persistent
contrail
is that based on its length and
sometimes the report says between 20 to
30 miles
based on time from seconds to minutes or
maybe even two hours
or based on the dimensions so not only
the length of the contrary but also
after a few hours the width of the
control so if you want to discuss this
in a scientific way you will have to set
up standards to discuss this
contrails are difficult phenomenon we
saw that from the previous speaker as
well
we don't really know that much about
them at least not in the open debate so
we know they depend on temperature on
local humidity about the composition of
the exhaust gases aerosols be it natural
aerosols or the aerosols from the engine
wind conditions etc etc so there's a lot
of variables which make this
scientifically a very difficult
exercise
so temperature and relative view
relative humidity and on average we say
well contrails can uh
become visible above eight to eight and
a half thousand
meters
and that is the same range uh in which
the cirrus clouds are found
we have this trails which means that
when an aircraft flies through cloud it
may alter as well the
uh the circumstances locally
and we have seen this also in
with the previous speakers the vortex
from the wing tip which is to my
knowledge not dependent on temperature
it's because of the very low pressure
and the low pressure makes compensation
uh facilitates condensation and they
just if vaporize again after a few
seconds or minutes
and you see this beautiful vortex when
the aircraft especially when it starts
landing
which creates an enormous focus at the
wind tips that you can sometimes see
these beautiful
curly
clouds
supersonic flight as well shock waves
also a pressure differential we see very
abrupt
will create sometimes well something
which you could call a small
and not persistent cloud
we also know that chemtrails exist
because we do spraying
we do spraying for crops for example and
we know that they have been spraying
also for military purposes so chemtrails
is nothing new
we know about it also we use them for
fun
and i don't know if you've ever seen
these guys it's incredible what they do
and they increase the show by adding
some smoke and colors and probably this
is done by a technology with powder
colored powder whatever
so we know that it's possible
one of the nastiest chemtrail records of
course is the ancient orange
the this report is called case orange as
well i think this refers to this
quite dreadful event in vietnam during
the war in which no less than 42 million
liters has been sprayed out over at
least 10 percent of vietnam laos and
cambodia
killing a lot of plants animals and
damaging humans as well
we also know that chemtrails is being
done
throughout the world in some countries
like china and russia because they don't
want bad weather during parades and
olympic games for example
we know that moscow seeds clouds to
avoid too much snow in the winter in
moscow because they say well it costs
too much to clean up the streets from
snow so let's try to keep the snow out
of town it doesn't always work everybody
who keeps track of the news knows that
sometimes it gets even worse like in
china
when peaking beijing had the worst snow
in ages because of this seeding
procedure
well you can buy a sunny weather for six
thousand dollars in
russia
okay then the odd event of
weatherman red report stating
that
some of the radar
images that they have on on television
are not created by natural phenomenon
but by
cloud seeding by military aircraft
the one in germany in 2005 is exemplary
which started over holland it's quite
big by the way it's more than two to
three hundred kilometers
and the weather report in america over
california showing the green uh areas
there in which this weatherman even
reports to
the audience that it's chaff and chef is
a bits of aluminium
and he says as well
i know what it is because i've done it
myself something like that
so this is happening it's not a hoax it
just happens
jeff by the way is used in
a military aircraft to divide maybe some
rockets
launched towards you to distract them
okay effects of man-made contrails
meteorologists
usually deny the effects of these
contrails
probably because they don't know much
about it so it makes it very difficult
for them to give any comments about it
but investigations have been done as
early as the 1950s in the 1980s and also
nowadays i presume
so we could say that the contrail
knowledge is quite poor
investigation as i showed you earlier is
quite difficult
and the only opportunity in which you
can do an experiment without any
aircraft was just after the 911 attacks
in which there was a window of three
days without any
aircraft and as well recently with the
volcanic eruptions
those data are being processed so
probably we'll hear from that
quite soon
but from these
911 post
experiments travis and other scientists
say that it shows a significant
influence
so
a contrail is basically a chemtrail even
it's if it's a contrail because
chemistry everything you see is chemist
chemistry so but the usual uh combustion
gas from an aircraft engine consists of
co2 water all kinds of nitric oxides a
bit of sulfur and the aerosols which we
refer to quite a lot uh when it comes to
chemtrails suit and other kinds of non
unburned
hydro carbons
so that's nothing new there
i do know from my experience that
aircraft engine over the years have
become more and more efficient
and that also states the report that
they say that well about nearly 100
percent of the fuel is combusted into
all those natural combustion gases
so the suit part is really very limited
there shouldn't be much in there
but on idle condition so you have a very
low
uh um
force from the from the engine you even
have one percent
of the fuel that is not combusted so
that gives a bit more uh pollution
so the engines become more efficient so
more mileage to the gallon better noise
property so reduction of noise and also
therefore less pollution that's what we
know so with respect to the aerosols
they should only be less compared to the
time in which i grew up
another thing
goes for the military aircraft because
they use better fuels than the average
jet fuels for civil affiliation
because they have to perform all round
in very dry conditions in very cold or
very hot conditions so their fuels are
added with all kinds of additives to
make them better for all these
circumstances though so
those combustion gases should
contain more pollutants more aerosols of
all kinds of substances which we don't
know because they're patented
another thing is about the military
fleet most of these aircraft are quite
old and they are using old engine
technology which means they are more
pollutant than more modern civil
aviation aircraft
that having said we are looking at the
effects of contrails on the climate
so we know about cirrus cirrus are ice
crystals usually above 8 kilometers
and it states that 30 of the sky can be
clouded with cirrus on average it's
usually less but it's possible that 30
percent is clouded
what do we know about cirrus well we
know that the earth absorbs heat
but radiates heat out again
an inter
immediate
modulator is the cloud coverage
so the cloud being white may radiate air
light from the sun out before it hits
the surface of the earth but also the
radiation that has hit the earth may
bounce back because of the clouds so it
works both ways
and the thing is that it is very
difficult to say which of these two wins
so is cloud coverage helpful to reduce
heating up or is it
not helpful but detrimental
and that debate is still going on we
simply are not sure about it
not in all conditions
and because the contrails are such a big
phenomenon especially in certain parts
of the world
we should make an uh another sort of
nomenclature
category in our world meteorological
organization so we should deal with it
we cannot just ignore it or say well
it's not nice or it's nice to see we
have to take it as a serious phenomenon
exhaust aerosols are nuclei we saw that
already for water to form ice crystal
and they create the visibility of the
trail so that's the ice crystal that we
see and then we can have either
persistent or short list contrails
we have seen this already
there are some investigations that are
looking to serious
formation
compared to what is already there in the
natural uh circumstances
and we can see that especially over
europe and the united states these
man-made serious patterns are seriously
contributing to the cirrus clouds
well several studies are discussed in
reports and
usually
they the discussion goes towards that
cirrus is quite negative for climate
these two guys weightleak and white leg
and cambridge of the stockholm
environmental institute state that in
general aviation poses a threat to
several stakeholders on the global chain
scale affecting the whole ecosystem and
regional and local and community and
personal scales so it affects basically
everyone on this planet and also all
ecosystems so they say it's quite an
important issue and we should deal with
it
there is not much action going on in in
starting
investigations or man-made series
it's even worse because international
aviation is left out of the kyoto
protocol which means that nobody really
has to look at it
and that's of course not a very good
idea if it's so important
the uk government
states that aircraft emissions if they
are taken into account
they will not be able to meet the
targets of kyoto which means 60
reduction in greenhouse gases by 2050 so
they even acknowledge that this is
something that should be done
immediately
in the united states then talks between
the federal aviation authority and the
environmental agency have ended
without any results because they only
were talking about a voluntary program
to reduce pollution and particle matter
of aircraft
so no obligation there to change some
behavior
in germany dlr suggested to lower cruise
altitude to
at least with 6 000 feet which means um
to get lower than on average where the
contrails are originated but doing that
means more friction so more fuel
consumption so it's a very difficult
debate to solve this problem but they
acknowledge
that
contrails are a problem
the only problem is in general the
report states
that we don't openly discuss this sort
of it is kind of a taboo
and they claim that it is probably the
lobby of airliners losing money and
everybody who knows the airline business
knows that they don't make much money to
begin with
um so who pays for that all and that was
also this morning debated
well the travis guys after 9 11
only a three day period saw an increase
of temperature of 1.10
so sorry 1.1
degrees centigrade
which is quite substantial that means
that no flying no man-made contrails
means a difference if you look over all
the years
of more than one degree and you know the
debate in in on global climate change is
in the order of one or two degrees so
this is important
it's very significant
after flying after flying started again
after 9 11 the temperature went
immediately down with 0.8 degrees so it
shows that it's important
climate gauge you all heard about it
scientist manipulating the weather and
climate data
so what does that mean the report states
does it even exist global warming or not
what are the exact parameters nobody
knows
in 1995 the ipcc which is the
international panel for climate change
they predicted the increased influence
of jet aircraft emissions is not
realized
and the report states then that the
aircraft emissions do influence climate
but maybe not to extend predicted
so the cooling down effect by contrails
outweighs the global warming potential
additives to the fuel may be added to
counter global warming or both
and this is one of the key issues of of
the report
then contrails and precipitation
well we've seen from the previous
speaker that we need some conditions
which means moisture cold air contains
less humidity than warm air
we need aerosols nuclei for the
formation of ice crystals
but also the droplets must be able to
come down and normally have water
droplets or ice drop crystals and they
just float around in in the air
and they must be get heavier
otherwise they just stay there
well we know that man-made contrails
that in jet engines we have
nuclei
maybe not so many but we do have them
we have a temperature a temperature drop
that could decrease the precipitation
but still there is a lot of debate going
on so very little conclusive results
an important
discussion in the report is about a
professor of the university of jerusalem
who has been studying
aerosols in the atmosphere
and he comes to very important
conclusions because he says increasing
aerosols first leads to more
precipitation so the more aerosols you
put in the sky then you get more rain
basically but if you go even higher in
aerosols
in the atmosphere
it becomes drier
that makes aerosol emission
sort of a
button for climate well geo engineers to
control weather
make it
drier or make it wetter
this will come back later as well
well probably rosenberg
continues then that we can thus
manipulate the weather by using aerosols
we can lower or higher precipitation
rates
only we should have the technology
to do so and well the reports claim that
this technology is already there
so we only need a scientific base
which means a reliable matrix for
aerosols ingredients versus field
conditions that means
if you want to change the weather you
have to have the right parameters and
the right ways to do it otherwise you
don't get your wanted result
they need an engineering system
well
preferably for low costs of course
and you need some sponsoring parties
that means parties that want to pay for
this kind of weather modification and of
course if you want to pay for something
you have a motive you have a reason why
you want to do it
something the report also claims is that
the discussion of contrails is not held
because um
if you look at the difference in
using the word chemtrail on the internet
for example google and blogs and images
videos news and forums you can see that
in the regular news chemtrails are never
discussed
while on the internet especially in
blogs but also in google and in images
and videos the increase on chemtrails is
enormous
this means that the chemtrail discussion
is only regarded
as a conspiracy theory
and so everything to do with contrails
or chemtrails whatever is not discussed
and as a scientist you you shouldn't do
and well you shouldn't be part of any
discussion
um
that means that you don't get any you
don't get any support from scientists
that's basically the reason
you don't get any interest by
politicians
and even by environmental organizations
well also they have a problem in
addressing this problem
basically
the general public doesn't want to do
anything with the knowledge that
is available because the reports that
i've
investigated is only dealing with
knowledge that can be found by anyone on
the internet
so it's
out in the open it's not even concealed
a small history then of geoengineering
for anyone who likes it the report says
to make it easier for people to see that
there is
a lot of discussion going on
a lot of testing being done a lot of
geoengineering been done in the recent
past and i'm talking about the periods
of at least 60 years
so we have seen some
large-scale testing by nikola tesla as
name was mentioned before
in the world war
ii there was the first atmospheric
seeding
after the the the second world war the
cold war started and we had a lot of
russian and american cloud seeding
programs going on
in 1996 was an important study done by
some of the
high level military in the united states
who came up with a report which is an
unclassified report so anybody can load
it down
whether as a force multiplier owning the
weather in 2025 this is a whole series
of reports strategic reports about the
year 2025
and of course
ever since we know that we are doing
something with the climate
we now have the necessity of
geoengineering for planetary survival
i'm not going to discuss all these
things because you can all find them on
the internet i will just show you that
tesla
has been working on extremely important
inventions
we know that uh there is atmospheric
seeding for military purposes i've shown
you earlier
in 2005
but
already in 1943 people were
using chaff aluminum parts
to mess with enemy radar so that is
nothing new there
i can't answer you a question but i will
do that later on
um in 1945 to 1915 there was operation
cirrus and where it says it it was to do
something with some kind of cirrus cloud
formation
and that means seeding small ice
particles at high altitude to create
cirrus
the experiment was done to create
mitigation of tycoons
so softening the devastating work of
tycoons well that's a beneficial
way of
changing the weather of course but
something went terribly terribly wrong
somewhere so the typhoon wasn't
mitigated it was even worse
and so there was lawsuits and stuff like
that and so they kept it quiet because
they don't want they didn't want any
responsibility for that
uh 62 operation storm fury while the
world says it as well
operation popeye very important in
vietnam
i've already shown you there so the
monsoon there was extended by 30 to 45
days in order to weaken enemy enemy
troops movements
and uh
there is also this weather modification
report which is basically a senate
hearing about this operation popeye
which you can find on the internet and
you just have all these guys talking
about it whether it's buying a loaf of
bread at your local groceries
and that is
somewhere in the 1960s
a lot of people don't know but the
report also describes that after the
chernobyl disaster this cloud of full
out radioactive material
was about to reach moscow and of course
the
russian government didn't want the
people in moscow to become sick so they
seeded the clouds
so this radioactive fallout
came down on other populations
who are still not really pleased with
that this is also openly discussed
on websites and in the media
another issue
which is also related to a conspiracy
theory is about um what do we do with
the
ionosphere
can we put a lot of extra energy into
our
earth atmosphere in certain layers so
that we can do something with it modify
the weather or use it for military
purposes
well already for a long time the united
states and russia have been using this
kind of technology
to change
uh
properties of the ionosphere
for communication but maybe also for
weather control this is openly debated
and you can also find lots of things
on the internet and ever since we have
built probably at least 10 known
ionosphere heaters
who are usually called research
facilities
around the world four in the us one in
norway which is operated by the german
max planck institute and five russians
and the one shown here is a norwegian
ionosphere heater harp kind of
experimental facility
so this is about the harp program
which is drawn up by the us air force
u.s navy
some civil partners and some other
military
parties
which claims to be a civil study to the
aurora borealis
but everybody knows that
all kinds of activities can be done in
manipulating our
atmosphere
this year this facility should be able
to heat
about 1 gigawatt which is one million
times one million watts
into the atmosphere
well when this came out the russians
were not amused because they find it
quite threatening
and the report states that about the
environmental impact statement will set
about 1000 times higher than what the
russians deemed safe
so there's a lot of potential in this
machine
it refers to the u.s patent
peter already mentioned several times
that there are a lot of patents just
openly
traceable on the internet
which in which you can see what kind of
well
known technologies or technologies to be
developed are
are available
okay
the history of geoengineering and the us
patent that i
mentioned is owed by arco power
technologies
and the report find out also through the
internet that this small company that
initially had 15 patents with regard to
weather modification was the initial
harp contractor
but it was then bought out to e-systems
and later on to raytheon corporation and
raytheon is a supplier a preferred
supplier for u.s aerospace and defense
industry
and the report also said that raytheon
initially wanted to have the harp but
they were not allowed to have it but
with a certain detour it came again into
their hands
and you can find these kind of patents
they're very interesting to read
in which you can see not only in the
abstract what it's what the patient
really does
but also some nice
interesting
schematic drawings about what is going
on
one gigawatt it's quite a lot another
path and then a method of generating an
electromagnetic radiation within the
latitude that encompasses alaska so this
patent even in its patent refers to a
latitude in the world a place in the
world where alaska is and well of course
there is harp
the reason that they do it in remote
place is because when you put so much
energy up in the air and you fly through
it well you all kinds of distortions you
will have in your traffic so you can't
have it only in remote places
northern russia and northern norway and
northern united states
well the conclusion that they give in
the report is that both sides and others
like china have tested and used military
and civil applications for weather
modification since as early as the
second world war
okay
there's a lot in the report about atomic
testing as well basically atomic testing
in the atmosphere also creates
electromagnetic pulses which are
basically a lot of
energy coming free in the atmosphere and
that also does a lot of things to the
atmosphere
um changing the weather probably
changing enemy electronics as well etc
etc
okay then the report an important report
i mentioned it earlier
owning the weather in 2025
it says that concepts capabilities and
technologies the us will require to
remain the dominant air and space for in
the future
so the report says let there be no
mistake the united states want to keep
their dominance in the world and they're
willing to do that
at a high cost and with all means
the disclaimer says it is a it is from
the beginning an unclassified report
which is quite special because they like
to keep things to themselves usually
when it comes to these kind of things
that a fictional representation of
future scenarios and the viewpoints do
not reflect of the united states air
force the department of defense and us
government
i think that's
possible
in this report you have two tables and
one just states that
it's uh
the report says that if we have the
technology
then we can degrade enemy forces
by having more rain for example by
creating flood lines by reducing uh
pgm i don't know what that is at this
moment decreased comfort level and
morale so that's basically operation
popeye but then with other technology
they can enhance storms
they can deny operations um well all
kinds of things that you want to do to
inflict upon the enemy
the other table says we can enhance our
friendly forces so there's a lot of
things that we can use this technology
for to make it to our own military a bit
easier
to maintain visibility to maintain
comfort levels uh to choose battle space
environment etc etc
okay
this
important report also says that current
demographic economic and environmental
trends will create global stresses that
provide the impetus necessary for many
countries or groups to turn weather
modification ability
into capability
in the united states weather
modification will likely become part of
the national security policy with both
domestic and international applications
and our government will pursue such a
policy depending on its interest at
various levels
and if you look at
what the report states as possible
effects of weather manipulation in in in
the broads of the sense
then these measures are extreme and it
is possible to change the weather
globally
and it says for rom the essential
ingredient of the weather modification
system is the set of intervention
techniques used to modify the weather
the number of specific intervention
methodologies is limited only by the
imagination
but with few exceptions they involve
infusing either energy
or chemicals
into the meteorological process in the
right way at the right place
in the right time
make no mistakes the road maps shown
here
the document is from 1996 and we want to
owe the weather in 2025.
you can see here that for example
they're quite good right now at fog and
cloud modification
that becomes more and more obsolete if
they increase other capabilities
like store modification
artificial weather
precipitation modification etc so this
is sort of a road map where you want to
go
another one says here which is quite
important that
the chemical
it says chem and
and
chemicals and aerospace delivery
vehicles which are now not at the
baseline
but are already somewhere have we now
lived 2010 so they are up to 30 40 maybe
will be increased over the coming years
so they actually acknowledge that these
things are already going on
okay
human activity influences the earth
climate we can agree on that we still
don't know exactly how the
climate gate uh inconvenient truth al
gore
there's a lot of criticism and of course
al gore is in the meantime a billionaire
in cap and trade
well we know that climate climate
has become big business
the report states that it is logical to
assume that our quality of life is in
great danger and immediate action is
necessary to safeguard the planet
i'll leave that to the report the report
mentions an array and a certain kinds of
means to counteract global warming for
example by iron fertilization and the
throwing out of iron particles over the
oceans
that means that there is going to be
more plankton getting co2 out of the sky
chemical buffering
we are both of these we are not going to
discuss but we are going to discuss
geoengineering
and then we come to patent 53186
of the used aircraft company
which has 18 claims one of them is
seeding aluminium oxide in the
stratosphere or thorium oxide
refractory welsh back material which is
also refractory materials consisting of
several chemicals
particle size is mentioned and the
dispersed between seven to 13 kilometers
so this is independent well use aircraft
company who got this patent in the first
place is now owned by raytheon again
and this is you can just find it on the
internet it's fascinating stuff
it says that spraying method
although not firmly specified described
in the background of the invention
stating that one technique proposed to
seat the metallic particles was to add
the tiny particles to the fuel of jet
air lines
so that the tiny particles would be
emitted from the jet engine while the
airline was at its cruising altitude so
it just plainly states that this is the
way to do it
okay coming back to mitchell and
finnegan then in a report from 2009
and the the paper is called modification
of cirrus clouds to reduce global
warming
they state that the seeding material
comprised of a pressed composite of
region bismuth metal aluminum and
gilsonite i don't know what it is
natural hydrocarbon
could be either dissolved or suspended
in the jet fuel of commercial airliners
and later burned with the fuel to create
seeding aerosol
this method is applicable to civil
aviation
any civil aircraft can be installed with
this kind of
material and nobody would know or have
to know it
they go on stating that alternatively
the mix could be directed injected
directly injected into the hot engine
exhaust
so that's after the fuel is burned
which should vaporize the ceiling
material allowing to condense as aerosol
in the jet contrail
so
all patented
it looks like this the
engines
from the the older engines from awex
aircraft and the k1 kc-135 which is a
tanker aircraft
they already have spraying pots and they
are described in another patent
and the patent is here describing that
contrail generation apparatus for powder
contrails for maximum radiation
scattering ability 85 metallic particles
and these particles and these contrails
should sustain for periods up to one or
three one to two weeks which is quite an
extensive life
so the logical conclusion from the
previous knowledge is states report that
cirrus clouds have significant influence
on temperature and precipitation
combined with strategic plans and
scientific studies it is a matter of
time before climate modification using
cirrus will be used for peaceful or
military purposes
if it is not already ongoing
are you still with me
this is real science guys this is boring
boring okay
if temperatures would rise 2 to 3
degrees centigrade some scientists
predict massive weather problems this is
stated in the report
recently five economists noble laureates
just before copenhagen proclaim that
climate engineering is the most cheap
and rapid response so we're not going to
look at the cause of the problem no
we're going to fix it
by climate engineering
and they have an old table with ratings
for several ways of doing this
and they rate that stratospheric aerosol
insertion is a very
good
that's science scientists saying it
so
in may 2010 this report claims that
climate control programs controlled by
military but approved by governments
are silently implemented in order to
avoid the worst case scenario of the
climate change
two basic instruments we have temporal
temperature control through artificial
clouding
and manipulation of the iron sphere
through ionospheric heaters
they anticipate that around the world
there is lots of
cooperation going on
of which the general public does not
know
just a few more slides become before i
go to the conclusions and the
recommendations
the same guys in october 2009 so that's
just half a year ago stated with the
delivery process already existing this
geoengineering approach may be less
expensive than other proposed approaches
it implies that the method for
widespread spraying of metal particles
through commercial and military aviation
is already in place and may even have
been in place for a long time
approval of the patent suggests that
extensive testing has already been done
for example by the use
aircraft company
combined with possible secret order
issues in the name of national security
certain patents may even be confiscated
by u.s government thus the public would
not have knowledge of it
but not of all
for europe and now we're coming to the
legal aspects of climate modeling for
europe clouds man-made clouds using
metallic particles created in one
country and drifting into another
country
may violate laws the example from
germany was one of them
yet if one does not know that this is
happening there is no problem of course
yeah in russia and china spraying is
legal they do it all the time if they
deem it necessary in the united states
spring is legal according to public law
there is public law that just states we
are allowed to spray on our populace
in the united states you have the space
preservation act proposal of 2001.
the first one was rejected in april 2002
after some unfavorable executive
commands comments from the department of
defense
in the unrevised proposal there were
statements on a ban on exotic space
weapons for example a ban on ultra low
frequency weapons a ban on environmental
and climate weapons and a ban
specifically stating chemtrails
the only existing official document
mentioning the phenomenon of chemtrails
was this
preservation act
but then they altered it and the word
chemtrail was removed you can also find
these documents on the internet i cannot
say if they're genuine i didn't go into
the depth of the
legislative library in the united states
for example but many websites are
stating these
documents
you can find at the bottom somewhere
the word chemtrails
what about safety then safety and health
aspects
for health and environmental issues the
present report only refers to the
literature with regard to aerotoxic
syndrome which is a syndrome that flight
crews experience
above average from normal people when
they are exposed longer times
in the cabin from bleed air that is the
air that is coming into the cabin to
refresh the air
which is drawn from the engines from the
part of the cold part of the engines but
they have contaminations with hydraulic
fluids
engine oils and maybe some fuel gases so
these crews are usually more sick from
these kinds of
gases
military aircraft
the report is quite
frank on on their views about military
aircraft i already mentioned that
because a military aircraft especially
when there's a war going on and there
are several
they contribute substantially to flight
movements throughout the world
many military aircraft fly under less
strict conditions so they are bypassing
laws that are
applicable to civil aviation so they can
pollute much more than a normal klm or
other aircraft
they therefore contribute more to the
potential
part of the hazardous air pollutants
and the report says that should be they
should be banned
okay
now i come to the conclusions and
recommendations of the report and then i
have my own evaluation because peter
asked me what i found
of this report in in scientific way
first conclusion is that the
manipulation of climate through
modification of series is neither a hoax
nor a conspiracy theory but currently
the best option considered by decision
makers to counter global warming
the impact of production of artificial
serous on temperature and precipitation
patterns is supported by adept hard
scientific evidence
second the ambition of the us is to
control the weather by 2025 both for
civil and military purposes offensive
and defensive strategies
this report shows a proven track record
third
the technology to organize spraying
actions on a global scale is widely
available both civil and military
aviation is used for that purpose
the mix containing metal oxides and
chemical components can either be
dispersed through special design pots or
directly incorporated into the jet fuel
the research paper is well documented in
this respect
four
since the pet patents are owned by the
main defense contractor for the united
states armed forces raytheon
or the u.s department of defense itself
and given the history record of these
companies and the government agency it
is obvious that current climate
manipulation programs are organized and
directed by the us government
five the spraying actions in europe are
only possible with prior approval and
intense coordination on top level
government levels and industry on
executive levels the general public is
intentionally kept unaware of the
existence of such projects
and six last one
although the spraying actions may be
considered legal these actions may have
a potential detrimental effect on health
there is sufficient scientific evidence
available in this research paper to
support this thesis
then the report comes with some
recommendations
that not enough knowledge is available
and scientific study is hampered by the
conspiracy context of contrails
therefore
they suggest to start a new
investigation from scratch
this should be a scientific study
looking at old research and pending
patents
looking into associations
from academia to political and for
example ipcc
including military
that are using climate control as a
weapon
the new investigation should contain
experiments
and we should start by using other words
like cloud seeding geoengineering and
weather manipulation because they are
still accepted while chemtrails is an
unaccepted
word
then
artificial serous clouds should be
classified as a separate cloud genus by
the world method methodological
organization additional scientific
research with the effects on nature and
public health on this subject should be
considered
results whatever the outcome should be
made public
it is unacceptable that the aywax
aircraft fleet under nato that operates
under a luxembourg civil registration
without complying with civil aviation
regulations
which is a flagrant violation of the law
and this should be corrected in the very
near future
given the very unfavorable engine
emission ratios of this aircraft
retrofitting of these engines should be
considered as soon as practical
three
when considering a legal case it is
better to sue an industrial group such
as raytheon rather than a governmental
agency
it is clear for us that the
responsibility of raytheon in this
respect is far-reaching with the
creation of a monopoly in climate
modelling and whether as a
geo-engineering or military instrument
if possible an international ban should
be placed on such weapons
four
although the existence of weather
modification projects have been
illustrated in an adequate way in this
research paper it is now the duty of a
serious politician on any level to make
enquiries to the government for public
release of these spraying schemes
through aviation
it is mandatory that such statements
should include the reason why such
operations are conducted it is not an
option to hide behind the motive of
national security
there should be five
but it is three it's just a copy of
something else sorry
okay
coming back to
what my ideas are about this
report
of course in my
years as a scientist i have read many
reports although not on this subject
and i can say that the
normal scientific report uh
buildup is used so it's starting with
nomenclature summary chapters conclusion
recommendations and in this case a lot
of appendices
and i've seen that this report uses a
lot of
verifiable references so
to my opinion this is a good report
it's a proper investigation although
most if not all
the information is in the public domain
so we can verify it
many resources
some witness accounts are in the report
i don't put them here on on display
because there was no identity given and
also the report itself is
anonymous so that is one of the first
thing that should should change if we
want to have an open scientific debate
on this
well the conclusions that i've just
given to you are well backed up by the
research itself
there they're usually brought in a very
objective and non-emotional way without
much exaggeration to my opinion
there is some reading between the lines
and and you can see that the the guys or
girls that made up this report
have a lot more knowledge than they are
sharing in this report and sometimes
it's difficult to keep within the
constraint of their own reports or they
elaborate a little bit on that and they
are connecting dots that we cannot see
except for us of course because we are a
bit familiar with the subject
so they didn't bring all the ongoing
discussion into the research like the
possible motives that uh
that mr murphy was showing about
chemtrails being used for other purposes
besides geoengineering
which might be valid but should be
substantiated with a lot of other
resources sources and
evidence
i think the recommendations are valid
and i could be supportive of those
recommendations
i think they could have even recommended
much more than that but i think this is
quite good for the purpose of this
report
some of
the skeptics will be saying in the
future that the evidence brought in this
report is um
to be described as circum circumstantial
but i think the
recommendations and conclusions are
based on sound logic as i told you
before
i don't think and a lot of people around
me think that as well that the contrails
shouldn't last that long if they were
just the plain contrails like we used to
see
also the health issue could be and maybe
should be more extensively discussed
because only discussing the health
issues of air crew is not enough to my
opinion and
in the rest of the day this has been
addressed several times
i think new studies
should contain
the contents of jet fuel and so the
doing experiments collecting contents of
jet fuel sampling maybe investigate
controls by sampling
um the studies that i've shown in your
films were quite interesting i think
we should do that all over the world if
we want to get a very big matrix about
what is going on everywhere and try to
relate it with your observations
by making photographs by videos etc and
then
we can extrapolate all these data into a
big matrix
about what is going on
and of course witness accounts i think
well what peter is doing here with the
possibilities that the
belgium law system has
in potential is to drop a complaint with
the judge who is then obliged to uh to
investigate and i hope that you will get
your answers soon of course
if people ask me why are you as an
academic from an esteemed university
speaking on conferences like this is
because i keep telling you that there
shouldn't be any taboos in discussions
when people are
concerned about things
and there are many more subjects that
should be and must be discussed uh and i
think uh peter compliments to you and
your organization to uh to stand up and
do that because i think the future sky
super glide is thank you very much